Re: vc or vc++??

C# isn't easier than VB.
MFC needs C++, how can it be "easier"? MFC is actually a pretty poor choice
of C++ toolkit, if you want native Win32 use ATL/WTL and for portability
there's wxWindows, QT, and several others.
You're right that VB is easier than MFC though.

The difference between these is level of abstraction, which does affect
speed, resource requirements, and ease of use, and not always in the
direction one might expect.

I guess that you mean most Windows CE programs use C++ to have better
control over memory usage. That's probably true.

I don't think anyone seriously uses pure C anymore -- the only advantages
over C++ are easier analysis, but if you need theorem proving you'd be using
something like Ada.

"Nobody" <Nobody@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eGG2UgS6HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
Hi,

You can write windows programs in MFC, VB, C#, C++, C, or Assembly language.
http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/Page_win32/index.html

So, it pretty much goes with saying that C# is easier than VB.
VB is easier than MFC, MFC is easier than C++, etc.

The basic difference is speed, memory space and ease of use.
Most programs written for Windows CE are written in C, to minimize memory
space.

All these languages, sooner or later, call the Windows API to peform certain
windowing functions.
All that really means is #include "windows.h"

HTH,
"rxp" <nothing@nothing.com> wrote in message
news:%23qaJlTR6HHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...