Re: ok guys
On Feb 3, 7:25 am, nukl...@invalid.addr (nukleus) wrote:
In article <1170409758.817629.203...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>, "Andrew
...
Thompson" <andrewtho...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 2, 8:32 pm, "manishk...@gmail.com" <manishk...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I wanted you to know which book is good for JSP/J2EE/servlet beginners
....
A regular poster around here who likes
books, maintains a list of reviews of Java
books. You might find something from
their page..
<http://www.techbookreport.com/JavaIndex.html>
He is not asking you what "regular posters do here",
or what "regular posters" mean on the first place.
For the purpose of clarity, I will expand
on that paragraph.
"I only recommend what I like or can vouch for.
I do not like books, when they go out of date so
quickly, and make such a large hole in my budget.
However, there are people who post to the
comp.lang.java.* hierarchy usenet newsgroups
whose /opinions/ I would trust, and one in
particular likes books so much, that they have
prepared a page of reviews of books related to
Java and computing subjects.
That person, TechBookReport/Pan, might be
along at any moment to suggest the perfect
book(s), but in the meantime, you might find
what you need at their book reviews web-page.
The page is here..
<http://www.techbookreport.com/JavaIndex.html>"
Note the OP is not that confident with use
of English, so I felt an abbreviated and simpler
form, better communicated the idea.
Could you explain it better?*
He just want some info.
Yes he did. That is why I got to the point quickly.
* ..and when I say 'better', I mean in an equally
brief (or close) form, as opposed to your usual
rambling style, vis..
<http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=epomkf$2v3v$10@sage.ukr.net>
...over 400 lines of text, to explain how you
could not work your IDE.
Perhaps you should brush up on your own
communication skills, by my example above.
Simple as that.
Simple? Indeed..
Andrew T.