On Feb 27, 2:39 pm, Lew <l...@lewscanon.com> wrote:
c...@mailvault.com wrote:
MsgManager
(string) @MSGID_1
(string, string) @MSGID_2
(vector<string>) @MSGID_3
}
Since the vector<string> msg could handle any of those msgs,
I might get rid of the first two.
Presumably you will not use the java.util.Vector class but something like
java.util.ArrayList or another modern java.util.List implementation in your
Java implementation, correct?
I don't know if we will ever have a Java implementation. I'm
interested in providing an alternative to C++ serialization
libraries. If we're successful with that, we might consider
Java support. What little I know about Java though is that
it would be somewhat unfriendly to our approach. C++
permits a class definition to be placed in multiple files
but Java doesn't. What we generate is intended to be placed in
a file separate from hand-written code. I have no desire to
add computer-generated code to a file that contains hand-written
code. So Java is not a very high priority at this time.
Oh. Given the subject heading, the original post saying,
at least for the part where you "send... it to the