Re: o/t: Derbyshire_trolling/spamming and solutions.
l?rs wrote:
Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> wrote:
"l?rs" <installed@PGD.org.invalid>
4a5fe6d5$0$1051$c5fe31e7@read01.usenet4all.se>
wrote:
[edit]
To better prepare you (group) for what may
eventuate, I quote loosely from a statement by one
of his colleagues.
No attribution (and the wording munged) so as to protect
the original content--available on the Net.
"Paul suffers a subtle form of autism. ..."
[edit]
Does this "one of his colleagues" have an M.D.? Any qualifications whatsoever
to make a medical judgment? Access to an assessment by a medically qualified
individual to support such an assertion? Permission to reveal confidential
medical information about the individual thus assessed?
You ever write a note to someone you were afraid would take
your words amiss?
Count the flare points in your messageplaces that sparkle
with emotion to highlight sensitive remarks and actually
cause the reaction you seek to avoid.
A troll typically begins and ends with a question. Usually a
questioning statement is built at the blunt end.
Your troll, Lew, is excessive at 4 (four) questions. One
might offer, "a loose cannon on the rampage", even.
This thread is not about sharpening *your* skills. Sir.
How does your troll _help_ a n y o n e, Lew?
This was not a troll post. I really want the answers, and I'm really
concerned that you are discussing a medical condition of a person without a
proper medically expert diagnosis or permission to reveal private information.
Another sign of trollishness is to attack the poster rather than respond to
the questions or points raised. I note that your response was entirely /ad
hominem/ and entirely avoided the questions I askes.
Did the medical evaluation that you posted have any medical expertise behind
it? Did you violate privacy? Please do not duck the questions. Again, I
really am interested in the answer. And please, do avoid an /ad hominem/
response.
--
Lew