On May 6, 11:02 pm, Roedy Green <see_webs...@mindprod.com.invalid>
wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2008 11:41:07 -0700 (PDT), cowde...@district87.org
wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
While I'm certainly no expert, I'm also not a novice. I've written
several apps and gotten them to work in a jar, but none had images in
them. And I can get this app to run from the jar (depending on what
code I have used), but I can't get the images to work.
I understood from you earlier post you could not get a jar to execute
at all. Apparently it executed but crapped out as soon as it came
time to deal with the image.
--
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossaryhttp://mindprod.com
Sorry for the confusion. Apparently, I wasn't as clear as I thought I
was.
Before I posted, I had researched and tried a variety of different
ways to load the images. They all worked from the class files, but
none would load the images once I jarred everything up. Most of the
time the jar file would execute, but not have images. However, SOME
techniques actually kept the jar file from executing - or more likely
- caused it to hang before anything became visible.
I was sure I was making some small mistake that I just couldn't see -
which is why I posted. I see now that my problem was that I was using
the relative path rather than the absolute path. Obviously, I have
more to learn about that. I'd read about absolute vs. relative paths
and thought that relative was the way to go.
and it may be argued that they are the preferred method. The problem is most
likely that you were using the wrong relative path. There is only one absolute
getClass().getResource(). There are a large number of relative paths you might
use, and each is dependent on where you base the relative path.
returned by getClass(). You need to base your relative path in getResource()
from that directory. Don't forget that the jar has a directory structure based
on the package structure of the class definitions.