Re: Do programmers enjoy video tutorial or written tutorial ?
On Aug 7, 12:07 am, Andrew Thompson <andrewtho...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 7, 12:25 am, Linuxmank <abhishekkapoor2...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
Ah Lew, Lew, Lew
No. It is just 'Lew'.
I reckon you are a permanent resident google groups.
And thanks for your abusive language on my other post on java gui
grouphttp://groups.google.co.in/group/comp.lang.java.gui/browse_thread/=
thr...
What? My browser shows that post as having not a
single reply. About what it deserved.
My blog have more than 100 happy subscribers ..
Well dude, with 'over 100 subscribers' why are
you worrying about what /anybody/ else thinks?
Look out YouTube!
(BTW - idiots are often happy.)
...good information provider. So I will NEVER ever going to change the
layout and my blogging style.
Like I said - don't change a thing. Ever.
<DWS>Can I buy some advertising at your site?</DWS>
But I wish all the happiness you should have from your little website
which you been moaning about in my two post.
What web site? Lew has a *web site*? I would be
very interested to know the URL.
No, I'm not interested in the URL of your blog,
Lew's assessment put the last nails in the coffin
for a site (I was not inclined to visit, based on
anything you had said) by someone that seriously
suggests 'video tutorials'.
So much for him appreciating the comments. He could have used them to
improve his site, but apparently his statement that he would
appreciate comments was not fully accurate.
If "Linuxmank" wants to spam a newsgroup of professional programmers
for his blogscam site purporting to serve professional programmers,
then it should have a professional presentation, which "Linuxmank"
does not provide. If "Linuxmank" wants to advance as a professional,
he will become better at receiving constructive criticism instead of
reacting with knee-jerk defensiveness, unfounded and unsubstantiable
claims of mythical "abusive language" and ludicrous ad hominem
attacks.
That he chose those unprofessional responses indicates the measure of
commitment he has, and to what.
--
Lew