Re: Separate interface and implemenation problem..
Lew wrote:
I have a brilliant idea: why don't you learn the Java language as it
actually is?
Mike Amling <nos...@gov.ir> wrote:
Sarcasm doesn't help the situation. I would think that with as muc=
h
Whining that Java shouldn't have a 'new' operator just because one
forgot to use it doesn't help the situation.
as you know about Java, you'd realize that it's a lot, and that it takes
many of us a long time to get there.
It took me a long time to get there, and I am not finished yet.
It would have taken a lot longer if I'd whined about every feature
instead of learning it first.
Once you do know Java well, there are plenty of things to legitimately
whine about. The fact that 'private' members are not public isn't
among them.
This is one of very few ad hominem posts I've made.
So you don't think it's a valid point that it's important to learn the
language as it is rather than to fight it at every turn?
My point is especially relevant when one is not very familiar with the
language. It is frequently not conducive to good learning to
complain, before one has learned of the thing, that the thing about
which one is learning is flawed.
Most of the time, if one is convinced that the language is in the way
of one's own genius, it's that one has misconstrued the analysis and
is not using the language correctly.
--
Lew