Re: Great SWT Program
On Oct 15, 4:21 pm, nebulou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 15, 7:04 pm, b...@pvv.ntnu.no (Bent C Dalager) wrote:
In article <1192472937.625159.154...@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
<bbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Ergo, getting a new account for every online purchase means waiting in
line at the bank for every online purchase.
....
This is irrefutable logic. You can claim that the system is
"different" until you're blue in the face, but this won't alter the
facts and the conclusions that follow inevitably from them by
deductive reasoning.
You might consider that people say things are different from your
expectations because they've tried it and discovered that things are
different from your expectations, not because they're lying to you.
Furthermore, implying that they're lying is an attack, remember? And
you never attack people.
So stop implying other posters are lying, whether you mean to or
not[0].
When the map doesn't fit the landscape, one corrects the map.
Exactly.
Your saying stuff = the map.
My actual experience in such matters = the landscape.
Your map doesn't fit the landscape.
Change your map.
The fact that your bank and, apparently, every bank you've done
business with (and that can't be very many, unless you go through them
as fast as you go through identities) requires you to show up in
person to open an account does not preclude the existence of banks
that have no such requirement. My own bank (BMO) allows people who
already have an account to open more (non-disposable, admittedly)
accounts from their online banking application without ever visiting a
branch, for example; if that's possible, then surely the creation of
temporary, limited-balance accounts can't be any harder or less
plausible. It's all bits anyways.
[0] For what it's worth, I actually don't believe you meant to imply
anyone was lying. Nonetheless, you did so.