Re: Which libraries in Boost are mature enough to be used in real applications?

Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
  > Wil Evers wrote:
  >> Instead, we now evaluate each Boost library separately before
  >> using it in production code. For some of the Boost
  >> libraries, we've actually decided to phase out their use at
  >> the first available opportunity. These are:

  >> filesystem
  >> program_options
  >> serialization
  >> test

  > I am extremely curious to know what was it that made you
  > decide to phase out the serialization library.

I'm interested in the reasons concerning all of them, but
especially filesystem -- I think this one is a candidate for
standardization, and if there are problems using it, it
shouldn't be standardized.

--
James Kanze kanze.james@neuf.fr
Conseils en informatique orient?e objet/
                    Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place S?mard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'?cole, France +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34

      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]